A friend of mine told me that “photography is sort of fake” (comparing with other art forms). I argued. A little time after I was looking at this sort-of-fake vase and I was thinking about how to make it even more fake. And I think I did it. Now this photo is sort of fake of a fake vase.
P.S. I’m waiting for your arguments why photography is or isn’t fake.
I started with analogue photography, although then I didn’t take so many photos as I do now. Then, once I had pressed the shutter button, that was all, just to carry the roll to a photo developing store. Of course now we can do much much more to “make fake” with our photos, and I love it, it lets much more creativity.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hello, Samuel! Thank you for your comment and your opinion! Creativity is great. I have doubt though that analogue photography give less possibilities for creativity!
LikeLike
Well, analogue photography let creativity on composition, etc. But with digital, I look a photo at the laptop and can choose if it will be monochrome or with colours, if it will have more or less contrast, cold or warm tones… That is what I mean
LikeLiked by 1 person
You can do all this things before you develop film or after in printing!
LikeLike
And also I would add, do art need to reproduce reality to be art? Painting, literature, sculpture, movies, reproduce exactly the reality? Obviously they don’t. Photography is more art since let transform the real images.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Because painting is “real”?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Something like that, David. What do you think?
LikeLike
I think art is all about interpreting, and the argument about whether photography is art is only about the mechanics of that interpretation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Everything is an illusion because things are constantly changing, so use your illusion wisely. Great photo!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Damn, Mike! You seem to know my friend! How did you meet him? 🦙
LikeLiked by 1 person
We went to different schools together. ❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you btw 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh this is simply brilliant. 😀 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, hello! Thank you for stopping by and your comment!
LikeLike
A fabulous idea, Alena! I personally believe that all art could be cited fake whether it’s a true facsimile or an artist’s impression of a subject. It is what it is, and whatever anyone believes it to be, doesn’t change it. As an ardent camera-toter, I hear no opinions that would upset me or move me either way. I simply enjoy our craft. I don’t think that there’s a single aspect of the whole life experience that can’t be, in some way, considered fakery. Best just to tuck in and enjoy it. Great post! Best wishes, Rob 🙏 📷
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thank you so much, Rob!
Your opinion is close to what I said. I think that anything can be fake or be art and it doesn’t depend on a form. In my opinion 🙂
I should learn from you not to hear opinions which may demotivate me! 😆 Because I hear everything.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think it is good to hear everything, Alena. Only then can we give ourselves the best chance of having a truly informed opinion. The trick, I find, is learning how best to spot sound opinions and to ignore those of less thorough minds. Separating the peas from the carrots, I guess! 😂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ok! Then I should practice in separating 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a fascinating photo! It shows well the range, what a photo can be ! Difficult to explain though in a short feedback.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for the comment and nice words!
And I understood that I don’t know your name!
LikeLike
Hi. So here I am: My name is Petra. Petra Pawlofsky. I sign my works with PPawlo and
pawlo@wordpress.com is my site Light, colour, sound, da sein im Netz. (being present in the net) A bit complicated, isn’t it? 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice to know your name, Petra!
I’ve been watching your blog for rather long already! So, the other things weren’t such a surprise! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think that there is passive and active photography if one can use such terms. Sometimes people shoot objects and scenes because they seem to be obliged to do that, or because it’s a tradition. When I do a photo for a passport or a school graduation photo – it’s one thing. When I participate in a wedding photo session or shoot some monument of a place of interest where I travel – it’s another. But they are usually technical, uninteresting. I memorise, document the reality, I don’t express myself in it. I observe a situation which is hard to pass by without a note. And when I notice something unusual in a daily routine or even create a new scene exactly for doing a photo of it. That’s a radically different thing which has nothing to do with faking.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Radically! 🙂
Thank you for your comment!
I think the same. And any other art can be the way you described
LikeLike
Fake or not when I see a cloud my life or life experience may see something you or someone else doesn’t. That’s not fake, it’s more authentic because it is our (my) view of photography. Sometimes your view helps me more than mine… really it does!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hello, Robert! Thank you for visiting the blog and sharing your opinion with me!
LikeLiked by 1 person